Notifications

Track orders, manage IT assets and get personalized pricing all in one place

CDW Logo

VIPRION & BIG-IP QSFP+ 40GBASE-SR4 Transceiver

Mfg # F5-UPG-QSFP+SR4 CDW # 4022891

Quick tech specs

  • 40 Gigabit LAN
  • up to 492 ft
  • 40GBASE-SR4 / MTP/MPO multi-mode
  • 850 nm
View All View More

Know your gear

Enhance your device's connectivity with the F5 QSFP+ transceiver module 40 Gigabit LAN. It transfers to a distance up to 492 ft.
Request Pricing A CDW representative will email you within one business day to confirm your request.
Reviews
(102)
Availability: 4-6+ Weeks
Need it now? View Similar Items
Add to Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Current Item
VIPRION & BIG-IP QSFP+ 40GBASE-SR4 Transceiver

This Item: VIPRION & BIG-IP QSFP+ 40GBASE-SR4 Transceiver

Call

Total Price:

Reviews

102 Total

Reviews by Ratings

45%
46%
5%
1%
0%

1-8 of 102 reviews

Clear All Filters
Offers reliable load balancing and security features with easy configuration
What is our primary use case? F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is a perfect product for load balancing and WAF, and I would recommend it far more than any other product. The load balancing capabilities of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) are excellent, and I have tried both the load balancing and th
Identifying compromised traffic and securing data has been a significant advantage
What is our primary use case? We're using F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) for our applications and for managing our incoming and outgoing traffic. What is most valuable? One of the most beneficial features of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is its ability to identify compromised traffic and its c
Improved our organization's performance by increasing the uptime of our applications
What is our primary use case? I primarily use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) for server load balancing and SSL offloading. The tool helps offload the SSL processes instead of having the servers handle it. Additionally, we use the Web Application Firewall (WAF) application for protecting our servers. Ho
Policies and machine learning are one of a kind, efficient, and provide minimal disturbance to the servers
What is our primary use case? I used LTM to segment traffic between servers, secure them from deficient connections, and protect them from web attacks and malicious behavior. How has it helped my organization? F5 LTM supports the application delivery in high-demand scenarios. F5 is very efficient in the ser
Reliable, versatile, and essential for ensuring the availability and performance of our applications
What is our primary use case? I use F5 BIG-IP LTM to balance the load across multiple servers hosting a website or web application, ensuring none get overwhelmed. It is handy for ensuring that services like my email server or database stay available and responsive, even if one server goes down. Plus, it is not
The product is secure, robust, and reliable, but it is very expensive
What is our primary use case? We are using the solution for our internal and client purposes. We are a cloud service provider. What is most valuable? The solution provides good application delivery and network optimization features. We use all the features provided by the solution. It fulfills our requiremen
Easy to deploy, offers good stability and customer support
What is our primary use case? We have deployed it for two customers. One uses the local LTM for load balancing the application. The other uses it as a raft and for load balancing. What is most valuable? F5 is easy to deploy, though more challenging than Kemp. Configuration takes time, but it's stable. It off
Helps to balance traffic but needs improvement in pricing
What is our primary use case? We use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to balance traffic. What needs improvement? F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is expensive. Pricing needs to be improved. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the solution for five to eight years. What do I think about
To Top