Notifications

Track orders, manage IT assets and get personalized pricing all in one place

CDW Logo

NetApp FAS2720 - documentation kit

Mfg # DOC-2720-C CDW # 5136983 | UNSPSC 55101510

Quick tech specs

  • documentation kit
View All View More

Know your gear

Request Pricing A CDW representative will email you within one business day to confirm your request.
Reviews
(93)
Availability: 4-6+ Weeks
Expected in-stock date for this item is between 4-6 weeks. Item will ship once it is in stock.
Need it now? View Similar Items
Add to Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Current Item
NetApp FAS2720 - documentation kit

This Item: NetApp FAS2720 - documentation kit

Call

Total Price:

Reviews

93 Total

Reviews by Ratings

62%
36%
1%
0%
0%

1-8 of 93 reviews

Clear All Filters
Offers effective archival and backup solutions but faces stability and support challenges
What is our primary use case? Currently, our usual use case with NetApp FAS Series is only archival. If a customer wants NFS storage, we offer them the NetApp FAS Series because many customers want to do backups on NFS, so we offer it as an NFS solution. Apart from ASF, we offer NFS on NetApp FAS Series, so it
Meets customer requirements and offers key features
What is our primary use case? We sold a very big solution this month. We sold two AFF 1K, A1K, and R2 with high availability with ONTAP on-premises to a large financial company. We are now working on an upgrade for another company. We are working on an upgrade to NetApp FAS Series 9150. They have a fiber chan
Delivers seamless functionality across environments
What is our primary use case? There are many different use cases, but the main use case for NetApp, as I know it, is NAS. It is among the top contenders when it comes to providing a robust solution for establishing a connection between applications and storage. NetApp is probably first or second in this field.
Provides great reliability and used to store all kinds of data
What is our primary use case? We use the solution to store all kinds of data. It's an efficient way to store data in a centralized place instead of trying to store it in individual locations. What is most valuable? The solution's most valuable feature is its absolute reliability. We have used a MetroCluster
Used for VMs with replication a feature, but need upgraded SSDs
What is our primary use case? We use the solution for multipurpose VMs. What is most valuable? The replication feature protects us from data loss. What needs improvement? The plan is to go with all SSDs and use MDM, rather than sticking with traditional disk drives. The goal is to have all SSDs for better
A hybrid solution for production system with high workload
What is our primary use case? We use it for the production system with high workload. What is most valuable? NetApp is the best solution because of price and production. It offers data compression and people management. What needs improvement? Installation of the additional switches and ETP could be improv
Deduplication and compression give us more possibilities, and unified storage capabilities simplify administration
What is our primary use case? We use it for VMware ESXi, CEFS for shared user storage, and we use it for backup of all of these. How has it helped my organization? NetApp significantly improved our data management. The deduplication and compression give us more possibilities. We have some disk databases, and
An user-friendly solution that offers good throughput
What is most valuable? The product is user-friendly and helps to evaluate the performance of each node. It ensures that if one node encounters an issue, the system can immediately redistribute the workload without interruptions. This setup provides uninterrupted operation for our systems. The high throughput,
NetApp FAS2720 - documentation kit is rated 4.60 out of 5 by 5.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Offers effective archival and backup solutions but faces stability and support challenges What is our primary use case? Currently, our usual use case with NetApp FAS Series is only archival. If a customer wants NFS storage, we offer them the NetApp FAS Series because many customers want to do backups on NFS, so we offer it as an NFS solution. Apart from ASF, we offer NFS on NetApp FAS Series, so it can be used for both archive and backup purposes, depending on customer requirements. Regarding the technologies we use inside NetApp, they include Snapmeter and SnapLock, along with normal storage allocation. What is most valuable? In my opinion, the best features of NetApp FAS Series are that it's simple storage. The most valuable aspect is that it still uses the old way of doing things. It is simple, and while it has hard disks that are prone to failure when compared to NVMe, its biggest asset is simplicity. Regarding data protection capabilities, NetApp FAS Series has the same functionality as other NetApp storages products provide, such as RAID protection solutions. We can use RAID one, RAID two, RAID five, RAID six, RAID DP, and RAID tech. The biggest advantage that makes NetApp FAS Series better is that we can use RAID technology on the storage. With larger disks offering ten or fifteen terabytes of storage, RAID tech becomes more cost-effective. While NVMe disks are expensive and require three disks for parity calculations, hard drives in NetApp FAS Series are inexpensive, making it more cost-efficient per GB, even with RAID tech implementation. What needs improvement? There aren't any areas in NetApp FAS Series that have room for improvement apart from the existing bugs. As an end customer or storage engineer, addressing bugs falls under NetApp's responsibility. The process involves contacting NetApp support to report bugs and receiving either a bug ID or a fixed ONTAP version. When we discover new bugs, we open a case with NetApp, discuss the problem, and typically receive fixes in the next ONTAP release. For how long have I used the solution? I am currently working on NetApp in my present project. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Regarding the stability of NetApp FAS Series, I would rate it seven or seven point five because there are frequent panic messages. When panic occurs on the node, it reboots itself, and we have experienced numerous hardware-related issues. This is why I would rate it lower than the current faster storage solutions, as we have encountered multiple issues with the NetApp FAS Series in the last six months. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The NetApp FAS Series is scalable and offers numerous solutions, but only if customers are willing to invest in the shelves. When purchasing NetApp FAS, it comes with installed disks, but scalability depends on installing disk shelves. If customers are willing to pay for an archival solution, understanding that it won't be lightning fast, the scalability rating would be nine. It maintains simplicity while being slower in performance. How are customer service and support? I would rate NetApp technical support five out of ten. Recently, we have experienced many issues, and the knowledge quality has deteriorated. They often provide basic solutions, such as suggesting a failover or a power cycle, which are not the sophisticated solutions we expect from a vendor. These basic solutions impact customers by causing degraded performance and requiring scheduled maintenance windows. They also don't respond in time, even for P1 situations. P3 and P4 cases might receive responses after five or seven days. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral What other advice do I have? I have fifteen-plus years of experience with NetApp, starting my career in 2008 with NetApp FAS Series. Modern customers rarely use the NetApp FAS Series because of its slower hard drives, primarily using it for archiving and backup purposes. Implementing NetApp FAS Series didn't provide significant benefits as it serves mainly as an archival solution. We offer it as a cost-effective option, but only a small number of customers use it for NFS or archival data. Artificial intelligence is not currently used for archiving purposes. I would recommend NetApp FAS Series to users seeking an archiving product. The NetApp architecture and design capabilities surpass other storage providers. While vendors Hitachi or IBM offer similar capabilities, my extensive experience with NetApp makes me prefer it. Comparing NetApp FAS Series with current market vendors is challenging as my experience with other hard drive solutions involves older systems IBM ESS from the late 1990s and IBM SVC twenty-one forty-five. The storage landscape has changed significantly since then, making direct comparisons difficult. As a storage engineer focused on space creation and management, I cannot comment on pricing as I don't handle those aspects directly. I would rate it a seven out of 10. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:partner
Date published: 2025-04-19T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Delivers seamless functionality across environments What is our primary use case? There are many different use cases, but the main use case for NetApp, as I know it, is NAS. It is among the top contenders when it comes to providing a robust solution for establishing a connection between applications and storage. NetApp is probably first or second in this field. How has it helped my organization? It provides easy integration between applications and storage. It helps implement storage provisioning services and protection services and automate everything from the application to the storage. That is the best outcome for the customers. NetApp has everything when it comes to regulations, compliance, and security. When it comes to AI, things are not that simple, but AI can help a lot with preventive maintenance and anticipation of any threats. What is most valuable? One important feature for customers is its ease of use and continuity, enabling seamless usage across on-premise and cloud environments. If the customer wants to engage with the technology, whether it is a block or a file, he has the same UI to manage, automate, protect, and implement something. Netapp offers unified protocols in the same machine, which I find very easy to use. The same GUI manages and automates tasks, protecting and implementing applications seamlessly. This represents a software approach with hardware support. What needs improvement? One area that needs improvement is the hyper-converged solution. Although NetApp has a solution, compared to Nutanix, it falls short. Nutanix leads the business in this approach, and I feel that NetApp is missing some aspects, such as CPU, GPU, and RAM, in its AI portfolio. Today, NetApp does not provide a server because it is not in their business model. For AI, they can provide storage support, but they lack computation solutions. It may be more effective for them to work with partners, such as Cisco, to provide the CPU, etc. Only companies like Dell and HPE can currently provide these solutions, but not NetApp. For how long have I used the solution? I have used the solution for five years. I used it in my previous organization. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Good globaly What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Depending on the product your are using in NetApp portfolio but they can scale easily. How are customer service and support? It is dependent on the country because sometimes the support is delivered by the local partner providing level one and two support. From our customers' perspective, support experience can vary. It greatly depends on the country and the size of the business. Sometimes, the support was inadequate because the initial architecture was poorly defined. If the implementation was wrong from the start, the support could not fix fundamental issues. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive What was our ROI? NA Which other solutions did I evaluate? The choice depends on the company's strategy, but I believe Dell is predominantly the leading vendor globally in storage. I cannot engage without considering Dell. While Huawei offers good products, being a Chinese company, it may not be viable for public sectors. Dell is NetApp's primary competitor, followed by HPE and IBM. Covering all of NetApp's portfolio, Dell seems to be the foremost competitor, followed by HPE or IBM. What other advice do I have? Overall, I would rate the product an eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2025-03-02T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Meets customer requirements and offers key features What is our primary use case? We sold a very big solution this month. We sold two AFF 1K, A1K, and R2 with high availability with ONTAP on-premises to a large financial company. We are now working on an upgrade for another company. We are working on an upgrade to NetApp FAS Series 9150. They have a fiber channel MetroCluster, so they cannot move to an IP MetroCluster. How has it helped my organization? It helps us meet all customer requirements. Customers have been using NetApp for many years. They are very satisfied with NetApp and continue to use NetApp and upgrade to new solutions. They are very comfortable with the technology. What is most valuable? At this moment, autonomous ransomware protection is the key feature. Artificial intelligence, deduplication, and optimization are valuable. The AFF C-Series solutions that NetApp offers are great. I have sold a lot of AFF C-Series solutions because the cost of the disks is cheaper. What needs improvement? The adoption of the cloud in Argentina is very slow. Customers do not move most of their applications to the cloud. Moving applications is a simple task, but the cost is a concern in Argentina. There is an opportunity there for NetApp with Cloud Volumes ONTAP. For how long have I used the solution? I have known NetApp for twenty years. I started working with NetApp in 2007 and continue to this day. How are customer service and support? I would rate them a nine out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? It is a little complex. It is not the complexity of the product; it is the complexity because of the money. What about the implementation team? We sold our own professional services. We have a professional engineer who installs and trains the customer, and we install the product. The satisfaction with our solution engineering is the best. We provide our own services, so the customer is happy with the service we provide them. Which other solutions did I evaluate? Customers always consider all companies and most of the business decisions are based on the global price at the end of the day. The competition offers similar solutions, but they are not the same solution. At the end of the day, the customer chooses the cheaper solution in most cases. When the customer needs a NAS solution, NetApp is the first vendor they think of. In Argentina, most customers use SAN solutions, and for SAN solutions, they think of EMC, HPE, and IBM. Now, with the ASA solutions, NetApp is considered but not like with NAS solutions. What other advice do I have? For me, it is a ten out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2025-03-22T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Super stable and provides a positive return on investment What is our primary use case? Primarily, we use them as backup targets. Additionally, we utilize them as archives or for slower-performing tasks, serving as masters for our customers. What is most valuable? The most valuable features are compression and dedupe. Since we mainly use them for backup purposes, being able to compress and deduplicate data is crucial. What needs improvement? There are some technical limitations, but it would be great to have in-line deduplication and in-line compression for the FAS series as well. These would be improvements on current features. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using this solution for around seven years. We are currently using version 9.11. What do I think about the stability of the solution? It's very stable. I use it on a daily basis. I would rate it a ten. It's extremely stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I find it to be scalable both vertically and horizontally. It's a ten. It's super easy to scale. How are customer service and support? I really like NetApp's support. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? It's very easy, I think, once you know the product. I would rate it a ten, with one being difficult and ten being easy. What about the implementation team? The deployment took around three to four hours. I upgraded it, created and joined it to a cluster, and then configured it accordingly. What was our ROI? We do make money from it. I would rate it around a six or seven. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I would rate it an eight out of ten, with one being low and ten being expensive. In general, I find NetApp to be very expensive. That's the main issue I have with them. So it's a drawback in terms of pricing. There are additional costs depending on the bundles you choose to purchase. Which other solutions did I evaluate? I have worked with similar systems from some Microsystems in the past, but that's about it. What other advice do I have? I would advise them that it's a stable, functional platform, especially if they are already using other NetApp products. I highly recommend it. Overall, I would rate it a nine. It's a great product. The NetApp FAS Series is super stable and doesn't give us any problems. It consistently performs backups as needed and handles all the tasks we require. It utilizes the same excellent operating system as the enterprise-grade NetApp products, which is fantastic. Most importantly, it just works. I don't have to spend a lot of time managing, fixing, or troubleshooting it. It's simply there and working flawlessly. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-05-30T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Provides good scalability and has an easy initial setup process What is our primary use case? We use the solution for its unified features of file and block protocols in a heterogeneous environment. What is most valuable? The solution's most valuable feature is deduplication. Also, its features for file and block protocols work the best. What needs improvement? The solution could be more flexible in terms of configuration. Also, they should increase the product range or configuration models for more storage options. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the solution for more than ten years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable and highly available. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is highly scalable. Its FAS2700 series can scale up to more than 1000 terabytes. How are customer service and support? The solution has good technical support. Also, the logs created by the system are self-explanatory. So customers can quickly solve the problems. As a certified engineer, I have resolved all the queries. How was the initial setup? The solution's initial setup process is straightforward. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The solution is more expensive than other vendors. Although, its cost depends on the use cases and configurations required. NetApp offers bundled products along with the purchase of the storage system. Thus, the customers don't have to pay recurring licensing fees, including the upgrades. There is no expiry for storage licenses. The customers have to pay for support services. The price for the initial configuration might appear more expensive than other competitors. But it tends to be lower after a specific time. What other advice do I have? The solution has a unique product line. It is suitable for small-scale as well as large-scale enterprises. I advise others to thoroughly understand their business requirements before buying the solution. If you need a FAS solution, go for NetApp. But if you require high-density storage, a direct-attached storage solution might be more suitable for your use cases. I rate the solution a nine out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Reseller
Date published: 2023-06-18T00:00:00-04:00
To Top