Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE

$51.00

$42.99

Mfg # PAN-SFP-SX-AX CDW # 5522890

Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE

Quick tech specs

SFP-SX Compatible
GigE
for Palo PA-220; Palo Alto PA-800; Palo Alto Networks PA-3220, 3250, 3260, 5280, 7050, 7080

SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module (equivalent to: Palo Alto Networks PAN-SFP-SX)
1000Base-SX

View All

Know your gear

Axiom SFP transceiver modules are pre-configured with an application specific code to meet the requirement set forth by the router and switch OEMs. Axiom compatible transceivers perform, fit and function identically when compared to original transceivers.

$51.00

$42.99

Advertised Price

Reviews

(27)

Availability: 10 units In Stock

Orders placed today ship the next business day by a CDW partner.

Add to Compare

Save to Favorites

Enhance your purchase

Show More Information (if available)

Top Rated Products

Pelican Protector Case 1520 with Pick 'N Pluck Foam - case

(1)

$216.99

Advertised Price
HP Desktop Mini 65w Power Supply Kit

(2)

$44.99

Advertised Price
HP Power Adapter

(1)

$56.99

Advertised Price
Kingston - DDR3L - 8 GB - DIMM 240-pin - unbuffered

(1)

$42.99

Advertised Price
Kingston ValueRAM - DDR4 - module - 16 GB - DIMM 288-pin - 2666 MHz / PC4-2

(1)

$33.99

Advertised Price
Pelican Protector Case 1200 with Pick 'N Pluck Foam - hard case

(2)

$79.99

Advertised Price
Kingston - DDR4 - 16 GB - DIMM 288-pin - unbuffered

(2)

$34.99

Advertised Price
Cooler Master N400 - tower - ATX

(1)

$77.99

Advertised Price
Kingston - DDR4 - module - 32 GB - DIMM 288-pin - 3200 MHz - unbuffered

(2)

$65.99

Advertised Price
Crucial - DDR5 - kit - 32 GB: 2 x 16 GB - DIMM 288-pin - 5600 MHz / PC5-448

(6)

$91.99

Advertised Price
Crucial - DDR5 - kit - 48 GB: 2 x 24 GB - DIMM 288-pin - 6000 MHz / PC5-480

(4)

$139.99

Advertised Price
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3050 OC 6G - graphics card - GF RTX 3050 - 6 GB

(1)

$202.99

Advertised Price

Reviews

4.5/5

27 Total

Reviews by Ratings

5 Stars 51%

4 Stars 48%

3 Stars 0%

2 Stars 0%

1 Stars 0%

1-8 of 27 reviews

Clear All Filters

By Michael Chiao - March 19, 2025

Customizable features enhance threat prevention capabilities

What is our primary use case? The primary use case for Palo Alto Networks PA-Series is for the previous firewall. What is most valuable? The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series is that it is highly customizable. So far, it works well in terms of threat prevention capabilities. What needs i Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Bilal Mustafa - December 17, 2024

Manage security with leading firewall features while navigating AWS cloud challenges

What is our primary use case? Mostly, my partners and customers are connected through VPNs. I have VPNs for my enterprise, which work with multiple customers for online solutions and payment gateways. I also have a contact solution for payments. How has it helped my organization? My firewall solution allows me to manage stability and security effectively. I ensure the stability of security solutions through routine checks and updates. What is most valuable? The most effective features of the solution are its Magic Quadrant positioning, making it a leading firewall on perimeter areas and internet edges. It functions very well in data centers. Its effectiveness is highly dependent on budget and approach. Moreover, the return on investment is calculated according to my organization’s sizing and has never been an issue. What needs improvement? I experienced some problems with AWS cloud parameters connected to Palo Alto firewall. However, I haven't thought of a specific solution for improvement. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using this firewall in my current organization for eight years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate the stability as ten out of ten. The solution is very stable for my needs. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability depends on picking the right box. For my case, it is rated nine out of ten. The solution can handle more than ten thousand users in my organization. How are customer service and support? The support has been shaky. Initially, it took one or two hours to get a Palo Alto engineer, which is quite slow. I expect faster response times. How would you rate customer service and support? Negative Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? No other solution was evaluated on the perimeter side or the edge internet side in my region. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is straightforward and mature. If you're experienced, it’s rated eight to nine out of ten in terms of ease of process. For beginners, it might be a six or seven out of ten. What was our ROI? The return on investment is maintained according to my organization's sizing, and no issues have arisen. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The firewall is expensive for every company, but the cost is worth it to ensure maximum security. However, I do not have exact figures on the financials. What other advice do I have? If you have the budget, go for Palo Alto without any doubts. I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? Mostly, my partners and customers are connected through VPNs. I have VPNs for my enterprise, which work with multiple customers for online solutions and payment gateways. I also have a contact solution for payments. How has it helped my organization? My firewall solution allows Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Hamed-Wasel - June 25, 2024

Works as a gateway for users and network devices

What is our primary use case? We use the solution as a gateway for users and network devices. What is most valuable? When I compare the tool with other firewalls, it’s the most powerful. It's the most powerful security engine. All the traffic going to the Internet passes through it as the first layer of protection. Because of its good performance, we also use it for decryption. The product's most useful function is its performance. I also appreciate the ability to create rules as groups and apply filters to each group. Each application has its own rules, which can be combined using a group, which is very effective. Additionally, we use Palo Alto Networks PA-Series for decryption, applying encryption policies on the firewall. The encryption policy works for all traffic going to the Internet. We integrated it with Active Directory, specifically with our three or five Active Directory servers. This integration works well for user analysis and policy authentication. The tool is rated high in Gartner reports. What needs improvement? I had opened a case before with the tool because I could not create a wildcard for the security address. We can create wildcards for security addresses in Fortinet, but this feature doesn't exist in the product. We use it as a decryptor using the decryption policy. Any site with a certificate chain with some intermediate CAs not in the CA database already downloaded in Palo Alto Networks PA-Series will not open until I extract the certificate and import it manually into the CA database. This is a workaround. I opened a ticket, and they guided me to upgrade the firewall to a specific version, but I haven't done it yet. For how long have I used the solution? I have been working with the product for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. We have approximately 2,000 to 2,500 users working through the firewall. In addition to the users, we have around 2,000 non-user end devices, such as printers and cameras, connected to the network. How are customer service and support? I haven't contacted the tool's support directly. We seek assistance through our vendor. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Fortinet has some features that surpass the Palo Alto Networks PA-Series. While Palo Alto Networks PA-Series' performance is very good, Fortinet offers some advantages not found in Palo Alto Networks PA-Series. One of the best features is the wildcard security and address. Another significant advantage is the built-in SD-WAN feature with the FortiGate firewall. These features are not available in Palo Alto Networks PA-Series. How was the initial setup? The tool's deployment is simple because of its intuitive dashboard. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The solution's pricing is high compared to that of Cisco and Fortinet. What other advice do I have? I rate the overall product a nine out of ten. I recommend it. If you search the Internet, you'll find reports and customer reviews that highly recommend it at various levels. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? We use the solution as a gateway for users and network devices. What is most valuable? When I compare the tool with other firewalls, it’s the most powerful. It's the most powerful security engine. All the traffic going to the Internet passes through it as the first layer of prot Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Patrick Brem - April 5, 2024

Provides excellent features and documentation and enables users to connect to the internet securely

What is our primary use case? We use the solution to connect to the internet. It is for a company that produces dog and cat food. We have enabled threat prevention. What is most valuable? The product makes me and my users feel safe. I like the URL filtering. I don't have to change or add something. I like the security analyzer a lot. I use it a lot to see if there are any configuration errors. It points me in the right direction. The documentation is great. We can find everything we want in the knowledge base. We can learn how to set things up. It is understandable. Even I know how to do it. What needs improvement? The web interface is slow. It is a pain. However, the rest of the device does what it's supposed to do. I rate the web interface a two or three out of ten. I rate the rest of the solution seven or eight out of ten. Integrating the tool into our security system was not quite easy. It has a steep learning curve. We have to think about things like security profiles. It would be nice if the vendor provided a penetration testing tool. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the solution for a year and a half. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The box is a bit small for us. I think it is a purchasing error, though. We have 300 users. How was the initial setup? I rate the ease of setup a six out of ten. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The licensing is great. We renew it, and it works. The pricing is fair. I rate the pricing a five out of ten. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We also use CrowdStrike for threat prevention. The Check Point products I worked with were very old. I have also used OPNSense and pfSense. OPNSense and pfSense are open-source solutions. What other advice do I have? We don't do much decryption of the encrypted traffic. I will recommend the tool to others. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? We use the solution to connect to the internet. It is for a company that produces dog and cat food. We have enabled threat prevention. What is most valuable? The product makes me and my users feel safe. I like the URL filtering. I don't have to change or add something. I like th Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Viet Dzung Nguyen - March 13, 2024

Easy to use and offers a good user interface

What is our primary use case? I use the solution in my company to protect our networks. My company provides Palo Alto Networks PA-Series to our customers. My company takes care of the product's integration part for our customers. What is most valuable? The most valuable features of the solution are its areas like performance and stability. What needs improvement? The product is perfect, in my opinion. The product's high prices are an area of concern where improvements are required. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Palo Alto Networks PA-Series for seven years. My company operates as a system integrator for Palo Alto Networks. My company also has a partnership with Palo Alto Networks. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. The product is suitable for enterprise-sized companies. How are customer service and support? I have contacted the solution's technical support. I rate the technical support an eight and a half out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? I have deployed the product in a multi-site environment. The product's initial setup process was simple. The product's deployment and configuration phases are easy. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. Not too much time is required to deploy the product. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The product is offered to users at high prices compared to the pricing model of the other vendors in the market. Which other solutions did I evaluate? I feel that Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers better performance when compared to the other vendors in the market. What other advice do I have? I don't have many details about the product's application control and visibility features since I had to deal with a lot of features in the tool during the deployment of the solution for our company's customers. The tool is good enough to deal with cyberattacks and meet the requirements of our company's customers. Considering the product's usability and user interface, I would say that it is easy to use the tool. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I rate the tool a nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner/Integrator What is our primary use case? I use the solution in my company to protect our networks. My company provides Palo Alto Networks PA-Series to our customers. My company takes care of the product's integration part for our customers. What is most valuable? The most valuable features of the solution are its area Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Fernando Cazorla - February 28, 2024

Offers a user-friendly interface, customizable security options, and ease of management and deployment

What is our primary use case? In our network security architecture, we utilize the PA-Series firewalls by integrating them seamlessly. Migration from Cisco to PA-Series was surprisingly easy, and we have centralized management using Panorama. What is most valuable? The most effective features for threat prevention in the PA-Series are its integration with Cortex and the use of machine learning AI for advanced threat detection. These capabilities, especially present in the newer generation firewalls like the PA-4000 series, enhance our security posture significantly. What needs improvement? Migrating from old to new Palo Alto Networks firewalls can sometimes encounter hiccups, and there is room for improvement in streamlining this process for smoother transitions. For how long have I used the solution? I have been working with Palo Alto Networks PA-Series for nine years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I would rate the stability of the product as a nine out of ten. We have not faced any issues with it. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I would rate the scalability of the product as a nine out of ten. We have approximately 3,000 end users. How are customer service and support? I have had a great experience with Palo Alto Networks technical support. Response time and quality have been excellent, especially for RMA cases. Any issues, whether for functionality or hardware, were resolved quickly. I would rate the support as a nine out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Palo Alto Networks stands out from other solutions because they consistently strive to innovate and stay ahead of the curve. Their user-friendly interface and customizable security options make them a top choice. Additionally, they offer a wide range of security solutions without forcing you to invest in unnecessary features, similar to SecurePoint's approach with blades. How was the initial setup? The initial setup of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series was straightforward, especially with prior network and security knowledge and a helpful training course. The intuitive web UI made the process comfortable, and overall, Palo Alto Networks seems to be heading in the right direction with user experience improvements. What other advice do I have? I have experience deploying and managing PA-Series firewalls in a multi-site environment, including international locations connected via MPLS. We use them for perimeter security and have centralized management through Panorama. Deploying and managing them across sites has been straightforward and effective which makes Palo Alto Networks a preferred choice for our network security needs. The PA-Series has consistently helped us prevent cyber-attacks through its threat prevention and vulnerability profiles. By configuring security profiles effectively, including antivirus and threat prevention, we have successfully mitigated various threats. Overall, I would rate Palo Alto Networks PA-Series as a nine out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner What is our primary use case? In our network security architecture, we utilize the PA-Series firewalls by integrating them seamlessly. Migration from Cisco to PA-Series was surprisingly easy, and we have centralized management using Panorama. What is most valuable? The most effective features for threat prev Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By reviewer2326002 - February 6, 2024

A next-generation firewalls prevent cyber threats and safely enable applications

What is our primary use case? We have a hybrid environment where we use a mixture of self hosted PA-Series. IRROLs and the vendor hosted by raws via the Prisma Access Solution. What is most valuable? The direct profiles is a valuable feature. What needs improvement? The pricing of the solution needs improv Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By DavidBerger - January 31, 2024

Offers web filtering and application filtering and good multi-site environment

What is our primary use case? It's our basic firewall, mainly web filtering and application filtering. We use it in a multi-site environment, especially with cloud-based firewalls. What is most valuable? Web filtering and application filtering are the most valuable features. The cloud-based aspect helps significantly. It integrates seamlessly with other Palo products like Prisma Cloud, offers robust VPN protection, and it's all in one convenient package. What needs improvement? The UI definitely needs work. In my opinion, the UI could be simpler and more user-friendly for the average user. For example, I encountered complexities with policy management. Policy management is one of the areas where the UI is not intuitive, and managing policies can be quite complex. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using this solution for one year. We work with all the technologies from Palo. What do I think about the stability of the solution? It is a stable product. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten because cloud deployment makes it incredibly easy to scale. High-tech, multi-site, or multi-region companies, regardless of size, can benefit from Palo Alto. How are customer service and support? Faster response times would be more beneficial. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? I have experience with Palo Alto's PA-Series and Fortinet FortiGate. However, my preference depends on the setup. If I'm looking at a single site, a straightforward deployment, I'd go with FortiGate. If I'm looking at multi-site, complex deployments and a cloud-based design, then Palo Alto. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is fairly complex. There's a definite learning curve involved in setting it up correctly. What about the implementation team? We require assistance from a third-party company for the setup. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The prices are pretty high, definitely on the upper end. They're among the highest in the pricing tier Firewall category. What other advice do I have? In general, I'd rate this solution at least an eight out of ten. It has some room for improvement. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Public Cloud Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? It's our basic firewall, mainly web filtering and application filtering. We use it in a multi-site environment, especially with cloud-based firewalls. What is most valuable? Web filtering and application filtering are the most valuable features. The cloud-based aspect helps sig Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

Show 8 more reviews

To Top

Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module

Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE

Quick tech specs

Know your gear

Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Top Rated Products

Reviews

Reviews by Ratings

1-8 of 27 reviews

About Us

How Can We Help

Contact An Expert:

Top Suggestions

Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module

Axiom Palo Alto PAN-SFP-SX Compatible - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE

Quick tech specs

Know your gear

Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Top Rated Products

Tech specs

Reviews

Reviews by Ratings

1-8 of 27 reviews

About Us

How Can We Help

Contact An Expert: